A post on a local forum blew up recently.
A woman, earning S3,000amonthanddescribingherselfasabove−averageinlooks,waslookingforapartner.Hertermsweresimple,andbrutal:shewantedamanwhocouldprovideherwitha”S30,000 a month allowance.”
All hell broke loose. The comments section instantly devolved into two warring camps, a classic online gender battle.
One side, mostly men, led the charge with a volley of mockery:
“You earn 3k and dare to ask for 30k? What gives you the right?”
“Delusional. Another one of those entitled princesses.”
“This is what modern feminism is? All the rights, none of the responsibility. No wonder she’s single.”
The other side, mostly women, fired back with equal ferocity:
“When men demand women be young, beautiful, and emotionally stable, do they ever calculate how much that’s worth?”
“She’s just saying out loud what many women think. What’s wrong with that?”
“If a guy is willing to provide it, what business is it of yours?”
In the mainstream moral narrative, this woman is a textbook case of a greedy, lazy, and delusional “gold-digger.”
But let’s take a step back. Let’s peel off the cheap moral label of “gold-digger” and think calmly: is this woman really just “stupid” and “greedy”? Or is she simply articulating, in the clumsiest, most unfiltered way, the secret desire of countless people in our era?
This post reminds me of another timeless question debated online: “Are all Asian women gold-diggers? Why do so many Western billionaires, like Jeff Bezos, seem to prefer non-white women?”
This question, seemingly filled with racial and gender bias, actually reveals the most authentic logic of power and desire in our time if you dig deeper. This has never been a moral issue about “gold-digging,” but a market issue of “value matching” on a global scale.
(First, a factual correction: Jeff Bezos’s current partner, Lauren Sánchez, is Latina. But this doesn’t prevent us from exploring the subtext of the phenomenon: what has changed about the partner-selection criteria of the top-tier elite in today’s globalized world?)
A Mirror to History: Where Power Flows, Value Gathers
Â
Let’s rewind to the 1980s, when Japan’s economy was at its zenith and Tokyo’s Ginza district was a glittering paradise for powerful men. The hostesses and ‘mama-sans’ in the high-class clubs who conversed with politicians and business titans—were they merely offering beauty?
No. A novice could only pour drinks. But a top-tier Ginza hostess was fluent in politics, economics, and art. She memorized every client’s preferences and taboos. She could, in a few sentences, soothe the anxieties of a man fresh from a brutal corporate battle. What they provided was an unquantifiable but extremely scarce asset: high-EQ companionship, a private social space, and the emotional value that “recharged” the powerful.
This was a highly professionalized, expensive elite service. They weren’t “begging”; they were “selling” a scarce resource—top-tier companionship. In essence, it was a clear exchange of value.
Â
The Modern Myth: The Dead End of the Gender Wars
Â
Now, let’s return to the initial debate. The reason it’s so fierce is that both sides are trapped in a logical fallacy: they are all using the ruler of traditional morality to measure the actions of a modern market.
The angry men ask: “You wanted gender equality, didn’t you? So why do you still expect men to provide for you? Isn’t that a double standard of wanting rights without responsibilities? A true feminist would go Dutch!” Their anger stems from a sense of unfairness, that the exchange is not equal.
The women on the other side rebut: “When you demand that women be young, beautiful, slim, and emotionally stable, have you ever calculated the value of these ‘invisible assets’? That is, in itself, a demand for value. So, for women to demand a corresponding, visible economic value in return, isn’t that a fair exchange?” Their counter-attack stems from a sense of indignation that their own value is not being acknowledged.
But here’s the interesting part: both sides are missing the point.
The Universal Rule: We Praise Ambition, Why Do We Belittle Desire?
Â
We celebrate a man who fights his way up the corporate ladder for success and more money, calling him “driven” and “ambitious.” But when a woman makes achieving a better material life one of her goals and makes rational choices towards it, she is denigrated as “materialistic” and “vain.”
Let’s go back to the girl earning S3k.IsitreallytheS30k she wants?
Not entirely. What she is demanding is a “quantum leap.”
A S3,000monthlysalaryallowsforadecentlifeinthecity,butthat′sit.S30,000 a month signifies a completely different lifestyle, social circle, and the resources and opportunities that come with it. She used the abrasive term “allowance” to clumsily express her deep desire for a life-altering “upgrade.”
The instinct to “marry up” or seek a stronger partner (hypergamy) is a primal human drive, regardless of race or gender. It drives society forward. The real problem for that girl was not her desire, but her choice of the most inefficient and easily misunderstood platform and method of expression. On a general forum, her demand could only reap scorn.
Because traditional social platforms are, in essence, “moral courtrooms,” cesspools for the gender wars.
And that is why a global platform like Btcsugardating is redefining the rules of the game.
It strips away the pretense of traditional morality and admits, in the most direct way: we all come here with desires and goals. So let’s put down the moral cudgels, present our assets and our demands, and engage in an efficient, honest negotiation.
Here, everything is transparent. It provides a space for successful men who value their time, and for charismatic women who are clear about their life goals, to bypass all the hypocrisy and mind games and engage in a high-level dialogue.
It helps you skip the moral judgment and speak directly to the “buyers” who understand the language of your ambition. Here, you are not a “Gold-digger”; you are a “Goal-digger.”
So, stop asking dumb questions like “Are Asian women gold-diggers?” Instead, ask yourself: in this global game of life, what “value” do you hold, and what kind of “partner” are you looking to find?
Finally, a few questions for discussion. Leave your thoughts in the comments:
In a long-term relationship, what do you think is more important: clear "value alignment" or pure "romantic love"?Should a man be more wary of a woman who is honest about her desires, or one who pretends to have none?When you look at the partner choices of billionaires like Bezos, do you see the "male gaze," or a "power couple" in the making?The woman earning S$3k and demanding S$30k: is she being realistic about her own worth, or just delusional?
